
Boston's Go-To Criminal Defense Law Firm
Boston Drug Distribution Lawyer
Information Regarding Drug Distribution
Distribution of a controlled substance is a serious, felony drug crime that involves the unlawful, knowing or intentional manufacture, distribution, or dispensing, or possession (with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense) of a controlled substance. It can also include counterfeit substances intended to be passed off as controlled substances.
Distribution of controlled substances can be prosecuted at both the state and federal level. In Massachusetts, it is primarily governed by M.G.L. ch. 94C §§ 32 – 32F. On the federal side, the primary controlling statutes are 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 860, & 959; however, there are numerous other provisions under both Massachusetts and federal law that affect drug distribution cases.
Because drug distribution is considered a very serious crime, it carries various sentencing terms, many of which include mandatory minimum state or federal prison sentences. To ensure you have an accomplished fighter in your corner, contact our team at Brad Bailey Law for defense. We can provide you with the hard-hitting defense strategies you need to aggressively challenge your charges in court.
Call (617) 500-0252or contact us online.
Proving a Drug Distribution Charge
In order to prove that a defendant is guilty of distribution of a controlled substance, the Commonwealth must prove three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- that the substance in question is a controlled substance;
- that a defendant distributed some amount of that substance to another person or persons; and
- that a defendant did so knowingly or intentionally.
If you are facing drug distribution charges, it is important to hire an attorney who is specialized and has extensive experience defending distribution of controlled substance charges. Brad Bailey is that attorney. Backed by decades of award-winning experience, he has successfully seen many charges reduced or dismissed under his representation. Call today to learn more.
Why Hire Brad Bailey for Your Distribution Case in Boston?
Brad Bailey, a well-known and respected drug distribution defense lawyer in Boston, knows the state and federal drug laws inside and out. He also understands the critical importance of pre-trial litigation in terms of filing comprehensive motions to dismiss and suppress in drug cases. Moreover, his experience as a long-time Massachusetts criminal lawyer who concentrates his practice on defending drug crimes cases, and his record as a former state and federal drug crimes prosecutor, is unmatched.
A small sampling of notable and significant drug cases that he has defended:
- United States v. Palazuelos-Soto, one of the largest cocaine cases prosecuted in federal court in NH (an international cocaine distribution case involving a Mexican drug cartel)
- United States v. Carlos Pizarro, a cocaine, heroin distribution, and police corruption case
- United States v. Polanco, a heroin distribution case
- United States v. Johnson, a heroin distribution case
- United States v. Mom, Oxycontin distribution
- United States v. Holmes, Marijuana Distribution
- United States v. Kilgore ( ED-PA), Cocaine Distribution
- United States v Freeman ( WD-VA), crack cocaine distribution
- United States v. Willis, distribution of Oxycodone
- United States v. Bernard, distribution of methamphetamine
- United States v. M. Urena, distribution of crack cocaine
- United States v. E. Urena, distribution of heroin
To discuss an effective strategy for your case that ensures you are set up for success as best as possible, contact Brad Bailey Law now for a confidential phone consultation.
Dial (617) 500-0252 to get started or message us online via our contact form.

The Right Choice for Your Case
-
"We cannot recommend Brad Bailey more highly to anyone facing criminal charges in any court at any level."Anonymous
-
"Brad Bailey is one of the best attorneys I've had. He's easy to talk to and listens. Gives great advice and is ready to do work hard for a positive outcome."Krysten O'Donnell
-
"This is one smart and hard-working attorney. He is attentive and he was ready to fight any angle the prosecutors could come up with. His experience in the legal forum is significant and it shows."Canda Share
Free Consultation
See How Our Award-Winning Attorney Can Fight for YouNot Guilty Verdicts & Dismissals in Cases Across America
-
Murder 1, Jury Trial
Not Guilty
Not guilty verdict after jury trial for client charged with murder.
- Aggravated (Gang) Rape, Jury trial Not Guilty
- Aggravated Rape of Child, forcible Rape of Child, Indecent A & B (Jury Trial) Not Guilty
- Forcible Rape, Jury Trial Not Guilty
- Arson Occupied Dwelling, Bomb Incendiary Device Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty
-
Perjury, Obstructing Justice, Federal Jury Trial
Not Guilty
Not Guilty: Perjury & Obstruction – Federal Jury Trial Victory.
- Obstructing Official Proceeding, Destruction of Records (Public Official) Federal Jury Trial Not Guilty
- Forcible Rape of Child, Jury Trial Not Guilty
- Forcible Rape, REVERSED ON APPEAL Dismissed
- Murder 1 Motion for New Trial GRANTED (after hearing) Verdict Reversed
- Trafficking in Cocaine, Jury Trial Not Guilty
- Conspiracy to Commit International Money Laundering, Defraud the USA, and Health Care Fraud (Federal Jury Trial) Not Guilty Verdicts
- Racketeering (RICO), REVERSED ON APPEAL (1st Cir) Dismissed
- Aggravated Rape of Child, Rape of Child, Disseminating Harmful Material, Jury Trial Not Guilty Verdicts
- Murder 1 [Adjutant Defense] Manslaughter Result
- Murder 1 (Jury Trial) Hung Jury
- Conflict of interest/ False Pretense Fraud (Jury Trial) Hung Jury / Dismissed
- Aggravated Felonious Sexal Assault (NH), Motion for new trial GRANTED (after hearing) INDICTMENTS DISMISSED
- Aggravated Rape of Child, rape of Child, indecent A & B ( Teacher), Jury Trial MISTRIAL; HUNG JURY
-
Forcible Rape of a Child, Jury Trial
Hung Jury
Indictment Dismissed
- Murder 1 [Insanity Defense] Charges Reduced
- Aggravated Rape of Child (age-gap) And Child Rape, Jury Trial Hung Jury/Mistrial Declared
- Possession of Child Pornography [Felony] MOTION TO SUPPRESS GRANTED Charges and Case dismissed
- Armed Carjacking, Carrying Dangerous Weapon Indictments Dismissed
- Misleading Investigators, Conspiracy Indictments Dismissed
-
Rape, Jury Trial
Not Guilty
Not guilty verdict after jury trial for client charged with rape.
- Aggravated Rape of Child, rape of Child, indecent A & B ( Teacher), Jury Trial MISTRIAL; 2d HUNG JURY
-
Impressive Results Across the Nation
-
Team Approach to Handling Your Case
-
Experience as a Former Prosecutor
-
One of The Nation's Top Firms