Aiding & Abetting Explained
The federal criminal code, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 2, outlines the principle of aiding and abetting, which expands the potential criminal liability beyond the direct perpetrator of a crime. This statute essentially states that a person who helps, encourages, commands, pushes, or otherwise causes another to commit a federal crime is punishable as a principal.
Examples of Aiding & Abetting
Some common examples of aiding and abetting include:
- Providing information or tools. If someone provides a getaway car or a weapon to assist in a robbery, they could be charged with aiding and abetting.
- Acting as a lookout. Someone who acts as a lookout during a crime can be charged with aiding and abetting.
- Encouraging or inciting. A person who encourages or incites another to commit a crime can also be liable under this statute.
Key Elements of Aiding & Abetting
To be charged with aiding and abetting, the prosecution must prove the following elements:
- Commission of a crime. A federal crime must have been committed.
- Knowledge and intent. The defendant must have knowledge of the illegal activity and must have acted with the intent to assist in its commission.
- Substantial assistance. The defendant's assistance must have been substantial. This means that their actions must have played a significant role in the crime's completion.
Withdrawal Is a Potential Defense
Under certain circumstances, withdrawal can be a defense to a charge of aiding and abetting. However, it is a narrow defense that requires specific elements to be met.
To successfully assert a withdrawal defense, the defendant must demonstrate the following:
- Effective withdrawal. The defendant must have taken affirmative steps to withdraw from the criminal enterprise. This means more than merely expressing regret or changing one's mind. The withdrawal must be clear, unequivocal, and communicated to the other participants in the crime.
- Timeliness. The withdrawal must have occurred before the crime was substantially completed. If the defendant withdraws too late, their actions may still be considered to have aided and abetted the crime.
- Neutralization of assistance. The defendant must have taken reasonable steps to neutralize their prior assistance to the crime. This might involve informing the authorities or taking action to prevent the crime from being committed.
You should consult with an attorney, as they can advise you on whether withdrawal is your best defense strategy. There are other potential defenses available to you that may be more applicable to your case specifics.
Being Charged as a Principal
When a person is charged as a principal under the aiding and abetting statute, it means that they are treated as if they had committed the crime themselves. This can have severe consequences, including the same penalties as the direct perpetrator.
Charging alleged accomplices as principals is meant to deter and encourage cooperation. As accessories are made just as culpable as the accused, the law aims to discourage others from helping with criminal acts and encourage people to cooperate with authorities and investigators.
Experienced Federal Offense Attorneys
Brad Bailey Law is committed to offering clients vigorous legal counsel and empowering clients to make informed case-related decisions. We can act in your best interest and help you develop a sound defense strategy.
You don’t just have to take our word that we offer quality and reliable counsel; just look at what our past clients have to say about our team. They recognize that “at all phases of [case] preparation [we] are thorough, thoughtful and quite skilled” and that we are “ready to do the work.”
Let us help prepare your defense. Call (617) 500-0252 and request a case consultation.